Sewage Map

Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar sewage map and spill data

23 storm overflows listed in the 2025 annual return name this water. All are operated by Severn Trent Water. Check the latest company report for each outlet below.

23
Outlet records
177
Spills in 2025
699
Recorded hours
21
Linked to a live feed

1 records show monitor operation below 90%. Annual figures describe the whole of 2025, not today.

Official waterbody record ↗How spills are countedSearch the national map

Outlets on Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar

Filter by the latest company report. The map follows the filters.

Filters apply to the map and list. Recent stops need a current report and a recorded stop time. They do not show whether water is safe.

Showing 10 of 23 outlets

Open full map

Most recorded spills in 2025

The highest 2025 counts among these outlets. A count is events, not volume or harm. Equal counts share a rank.

  1. 1
    Melton - Asfordby Road 137 (CSO)

    Severn Trent Water · monitor coverage 89.1%, below 90%

    40spills
  2. 2
    Asfordby - Riverside Walk (CSO)

    Severn Trent Water

    16spills
  3. 3
    Asfordby - Pump Lane CSO

    Severn Trent Water

    15spills
  4. 3
    Melton - Nottingham Rd/Welby Ln (CSO)

    Severn Trent Water

    15spills
  5. 3
    Melton STW (SSTO)

    Severn Trent Water

    15spills

Spills over time

The median outlet on Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar recorded 4 spills in 2025, against 11 across England.

19 outlets have a comparable count for both 2024 and 2025, with the monitor working at least 90% of each year. 3 recorded more spills, 14 fewer and 2 the same. Together they went from 314 to 132 spills, a fall of 58%.

Largest rises from 2024 to 2025

YearOutlets with a countTotal spillsMedian per outletEngland median
202523177411
2024233661319
202351093020
20225752313
202151081919
2020416644.518

Earlier returns list fewer of these outlets, so totals are not comparable between years. The median per outlet and the like-for-like change are fairer comparisons. Counts are events, not volume.

All outlet records on Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar

23 outlet records in alphabetical order. Each link opens the outlet page with its latest report and annual history.

Sources and dates

Outlet locations, waterbody links and spill figures come from the Environment Agency 2025 event duration monitoring annual return. The latest company reports come from each operator’s live feed and carry their own dates. Waterbody ID: GB104028047550. The official waterbody record is a source lookup; its classification is not imported here.

All sourcesHow the data worksReport pollution

Questions about Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar

Which outlets are linked to Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar?
The source links 23 outlet records to waterbody GB104028047550. The link comes from the annual return; it does not model where a discharge travelled.
How many spills were recorded for Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar?
23 records report 177 spills in 2025 and 699 recorded hours. All listed records have a usable count. Outlets can discharge at the same time, so the hours are not the time the whole water was affected.
Who is responsible for the outlets on Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar?
Severn Trent Water operates every listed outlet. Contact the operator or the official pollution service if you see a problem in the water.
Which outlets on Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar are linked to a live feed?
21 of the 23 records are matched to a monitor in a company live feed. A link does not mean the monitor is working now. Use the status filters above to see the latest report for each outlet, with its date. The rest show annual figures only.
How complete is the monitoring for Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar?
1 of the listed records have monitor operation below 90% for 2025. Events can be missed when a monitor is not working, so low counts from those outlets may understate activity.
Does this show if Eye / Wreake from Langham Brook to Soar is safe?
No. Event duration data does not measure bacteria, chemicals or current water quality. Use official local water-quality advice for that question.