Prince Consort Road SPS
Storm overflow operated by Northumbrian Water. The source names River Tyne as the receiving water.
- 39
- Spills in 2025
- 109.5
- Recorded hours
- 99.7%
- Monitor operation
- 2
- Years listed
The reported spill count was 16 lower than in 2024. This compares event counts, not discharge volume.
Checking the latest monitor report…
How it compares in 2025
Prince Consort Road SPS recorded 39 spills in 2025. That is more than 81% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 2,494th nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 216th of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Tyne waterbody it ranks 29th of 177.
| Group | Rank by spills | Median spills | Median hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| This outlet | – | 39 | 109.5 |
| England | 2,494th of 14,239 | 11 | 22.3 |
| Northumbrian Water | 216th of 1,559 | 11 | 15.6 |
| Tyne | 29th of 177 | 14 | 11.2 |
Rank 1 has the most spills. Equal counts share a rank. Only overflows with a reported count are ranked. Counts do not measure volume, so a higher rank does not mean more sewage.
Annual spill history
| Year | Spills | Duration | Monitor operation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39 | 109.5 hours | 99.7% | Official data |
| 2024 | 55 | 242.5 hours | 100% | Official data |
A missing figure means the source did not provide a usable value. A zero is shown as zero. Monitor operation below 90% can make comparison less reliable.
Outlet details
- Water company
- Northumbrian Water
- Outlet type
- Storm discharge at a pumping station
- Permit
- 235/1657
- Activity reference
- A1
- Grid reference
- NZ3007064916
- Waterbody ID
- GB510302310200Official waterbody record ↗
- Location source
- Official annual grid reference
- Location precision
- About 1 metres
- Location note
- Unknown
About the name and type
The annual return lists this asset as “Storm discharge at pumping station”: storm discharge at a pumping station. The overflow is at a pumping station that moves sewage through the network.
The waterbody link opens the Environment Agency record for the exact ID in the return. It is a source lookup; we do not import its classification.
Where it is
The recorded position is about 1.2 km west of the Hebburn reference point in the ONS built-up areas data.
Area and water pages
- Gateshead area →
- Kibblesworth area →
- Follingsby area →
- Springwell area →
- Birtley area →
- Washington area →
- Hebburn area →
- Wallsend area →
- Longbenton area →
- Newcastle upon Tyne area →
- Jarrow area →
- Boldon Colliery area →
- Killingworth area →
- Shiremoor area →
- Backworth area →
- East Boldon and West Boldon area →
- Tynemouth area →
- South Shields area →
- Tyne waterbody →
Check the official record
Public access to this outlet is unknown. Do not enter restricted land or use this page as a route guide.
Open official source ↗Other outlet records nearby
- CSO Welbeck Road & Bath StreetCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · Tyne Estuary
- New Welbeck Road SPSCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · River Tyne
- CSO Neptune Yard No.1 OutfallCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · Tyne Estuary
- CSO At Reyrolle Sewer (North)Current status unknown
Northumbrian Water · River Tyne (Estuary)
Questions about Prince Consort Road SPS
- Who operates Prince Consort Road SPS?
- Northumbrian Water is the operator named in the annual record. The permit reference is 235/1657.
- Where does Prince Consort Road SPS discharge?
- The source names River Tyne as the receiving water. This does not show how far a discharge travelled.
- How many times did Prince Consort Road SPS spill in 2025?
- The 2025 return records 39 counted spill events and 109.5 hours of recorded discharge. Spills are counted with the 12/24-hour method, so this is not a count of every start signal.
- Can I trust the 2025 figures for this outlet?
- The monitor worked for 99.7% of the reporting period, so the annual figures cover most of the year. They still do not measure discharge volume.
- Is Prince Consort Road SPS discharging right now?
- This record is linked to a company live feed. The panel above shows the latest report we hold, with its date. That report can be old, and the monitor can be offline, so check the date before relying on it. A report that no discharge is taking place is not a water-quality result.
- How accurate is the map marker?
- The marker comes from the grid reference in the official annual return, which is accurate to about 1 metres. It shows the recorded outlet position, not the extent of any discharge.
- What kind of outlet is Prince Consort Road SPS?
- The annual return lists the asset type as “Storm discharge at pumping station”, which means storm discharge at a pumping station. The overflow is at a pumping station that moves sewage through the network.
- How does Prince Consort Road SPS compare with other overflows?
- Prince Consort Road SPS recorded 39 spills in 2025. That is more than 81% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 2,494th nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 216th of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Tyne waterbody it ranks 29th of 177. Ranks compare counted spill events only. They do not compare volume or harm.
- Does zero spills mean the water was safe?
- No. A zero means the annual return recorded zero counted spill events for this outlet and year. It is not a water-quality test, and pollution can come from other sources.