Foxdenton Lane CSO
Storm overflow operated by United Utilities. The source names Wince Brook as the receiving water.
- 52
- Spills in 2025
- 80.3
- Recorded hours
- 97%
- Monitor operation
- 2
- Years listed
The reported spill count was 6 lower than in 2024. This compares event counts, not discharge volume.
Checking the latest monitor report…
How it compares in 2025
Foxdenton Lane CSO recorded 52 spills in 2025. That is more than 88% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 1,512th nationally. Among United Utilities overflows it ranks 416th of 2,270; the median United Utilities overflow recorded 15 spills. On the Wince Brook waterbody it ranks 3rd of 17.
| Group | Rank by spills | Median spills | Median hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| This outlet | – | 52 | 80.3 |
| England | 1,512th of 14,239 | 11 | 22.3 |
| United Utilities | 416th of 2,270 | 15 | 29.1 |
| Wince Brook | 3rd of 17 | 14 | 34.5 |
Rank 1 has the most spills. Equal counts share a rank. Only overflows with a reported count are ranked. Counts do not measure volume, so a higher rank does not mean more sewage.
Annual spill history
| Year | Spills | Duration | Monitor operation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52 | 80.3 hours | 97% | Official data |
| 2024 | 58 | 88.3 hours | 99% | Official data |
A missing figure means the source did not provide a usable value. A zero is shown as zero. Monitor operation below 90% can make comparison less reliable.
Outlet details
- Water company
- United Utilities
- Outlet type
- Storm overflow on the sewer network
- Permit
- 016983136
- Activity reference
- A1
- Grid reference
- SD8957004540
- Waterbody ID
- GB112069061120Official waterbody record ↗
- Location source
- Official annual grid reference
- Location precision
- About 1 metres
- Location note
- Unknown
About the name and type
The annual return lists this asset as “SO on sewer network”: storm overflow on the sewer network. The return places this overflow on the sewer network.
The waterbody link opens the Environment Agency record for the exact ID in the return. It is a source lookup; we do not import its classification.
Where it is
The recorded position is about 0.4 km north-west of the Chadderton reference point in the ONS built-up areas data.
Area and water pages
- Manchester area →
- Droylsden area →
- Audenshaw area →
- Chadderton area →
- Whitefield area →
- Pendlebury area →
- Salford area →
- Prestwich area →
- Failsworth area →
- Rhodes area →
- Denton (Tameside) area →
- Simister area →
- Woodhouses area →
- Middleton (Rochdale) area →
- Ashton-under-Lyne area →
- Birch area →
- Dukinfield area →
- Oldham area →
- Slattocks area →
- Heywood area →
- Royton area →
- Trub area →
- Stalybridge area →
- Mossley area →
- Wince Brook waterbody →
Check the official record
Public access to this outlet is unknown. Do not enter restricted land or use this page as a route guide.
Open official source ↗Other outlet records nearby
- OLDHAM WwTWCurrent status unknown
United Utilities · Wince Brook
- OLDHAM WwTWCurrent status unknown
United Utilities · Wince Brook
- OLDHAM WwTWCurrent status unknown
United Utilities · Wince Brook
- OLDHAM WwTWCurrent status unknown
United Utilities · Wince Brook
Questions about Foxdenton Lane CSO
- Who operates Foxdenton Lane CSO?
- United Utilities is the operator named in the annual record. The permit reference is 016983136.
- Where does Foxdenton Lane CSO discharge?
- The source names Wince Brook as the receiving water. This does not show how far a discharge travelled.
- How many times did Foxdenton Lane CSO spill in 2025?
- The 2025 return records 52 counted spill events and 80.3 hours of recorded discharge. Spills are counted with the 12/24-hour method, so this is not a count of every start signal.
- Can I trust the 2025 figures for this outlet?
- The monitor worked for 97% of the reporting period, so the annual figures cover most of the year. They still do not measure discharge volume.
- Is Foxdenton Lane CSO discharging right now?
- This record is linked to a company live feed. The panel above shows the latest report we hold, with its date. That report can be old, and the monitor can be offline, so check the date before relying on it. A report that no discharge is taking place is not a water-quality result.
- How accurate is the map marker?
- The marker comes from the grid reference in the official annual return, which is accurate to about 1 metres. It shows the recorded outlet position, not the extent of any discharge.
- What kind of outlet is Foxdenton Lane CSO?
- The annual return lists the asset type as “SO on sewer network”, which means storm overflow on the sewer network. The return places this overflow on the sewer network.
- How does Foxdenton Lane CSO compare with other overflows?
- Foxdenton Lane CSO recorded 52 spills in 2025. That is more than 88% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 1,512th nationally. Among United Utilities overflows it ranks 416th of 2,270; the median United Utilities overflow recorded 15 spills. On the Wince Brook waterbody it ranks 3rd of 17. Ranks compare counted spill events only. They do not compare volume or harm.
- Does zero spills mean the water was safe?
- No. A zero means the annual return recorded zero counted spill events for this outlet and year. It is not a water-quality test, and pollution can come from other sources.