Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO
Storm overflow operated by Northumbrian Water. The source names Tyne as the receiving water.
- 36
- Spills in 2025
- 159.2
- Recorded hours
- 100%
- Monitor operation
- 2
- Years listed
The reported spill count was 11 lower than in 2024. This compares event counts, not discharge volume.
Checking the latest monitor report…
How it compares in 2025
Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO recorded 36 spills in 2025. That is more than 79% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 2,801st nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 259th of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Tyne waterbody it ranks 34th of 177.
| Group | Rank by spills | Median spills | Median hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| This outlet | – | 36 | 159.2 |
| England | 2,801st of 14,239 | 11 | 22.3 |
| Northumbrian Water | 259th of 1,559 | 11 | 15.6 |
| Tyne | 34th of 177 | 14 | 11.2 |
Rank 1 has the most spills. Equal counts share a rank. Only overflows with a reported count are ranked. Counts do not measure volume, so a higher rank does not mean more sewage.
Annual spill history
| Year | Spills | Duration | Monitor operation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36 | 159.2 hours | 100% | Official data |
| 2024 | 47 | 272.5 hours | 99.9% | Official data |
A missing figure means the source did not provide a usable value. A zero is shown as zero. Monitor operation below 90% can make comparison less reliable.
Outlet details
- Water company
- Northumbrian Water
- Outlet type
- Storm overflow on the sewer network
- Permit
- 235/1686
- Activity reference
- A1
- Grid reference
- NZ1869463551
- Waterbody ID
- GB510302310200Official waterbody record ↗
- Location source
- Official annual grid reference
- Location precision
- About 1 metres
- Location note
- Unknown
About the name and type
The annual return lists this asset as “SO on sewer network”: storm overflow on the sewer network. The return places this overflow on the sewer network.
The waterbody link opens the Environment Agency record for the exact ID in the return. It is a source lookup; we do not import its classification.
Where it is
The recorded position is about 0.8 km north-west of the Blaydon reference point in the ONS built-up areas data.
Area and water pages
- Gateshead area →
- Kibblesworth area →
- Whickham area →
- Sunniside area →
- Burnopfield area →
- Beamish area →
- Hobson area →
- Tanfield Lea area →
- Tantobie area →
- Newcastle upon Tyne area →
- Blaydon area →
- Rowlands Gill area →
- Hamsterley Mill area →
- High Spen area →
- Newburn area →
- Walbottle area →
- Ryton area →
- Chopwell area →
- Dipton area →
- Blackhall Mill area →
- Tyne waterbody →
Check the official record
Public access to this outlet is unknown. Do not enter restricted land or use this page as a route guide.
Open official source ↗Other outlet records nearby
- Blaydon Metals No 1 CSOCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · Tyne Saline Estuary
- Factory Road CSOCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · Tyne (Tidal)
- Gas Lane CSOCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · River Tyne Saline Estuary
- Newburn Haugh/Riversdale Way P StnCurrent status unknown
Northumbrian Water · River Tyne Saline Estuary
Questions about Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO
- Who operates Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO?
- Northumbrian Water is the operator named in the annual record. The permit reference is 235/1686.
- Where does Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO discharge?
- The source names Tyne as the receiving water. This does not show how far a discharge travelled.
- How many times did Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO spill in 2025?
- The 2025 return records 36 counted spill events and 159.2 hours of recorded discharge. Spills are counted with the 12/24-hour method, so this is not a count of every start signal.
- Can I trust the 2025 figures for this outlet?
- The monitor worked for 100% of the reporting period, so the annual figures cover most of the year. They still do not measure discharge volume.
- Is Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO discharging right now?
- This record is linked to a company live feed. The panel above shows the latest report we hold, with its date. That report can be old, and the monitor can be offline, so check the date before relying on it. A report that no discharge is taking place is not a water-quality result.
- How accurate is the map marker?
- The marker comes from the grid reference in the official annual return, which is accurate to about 1 metres. It shows the recorded outlet position, not the extent of any discharge.
- What kind of outlet is Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO?
- The annual return lists the asset type as “SO on sewer network”, which means storm overflow on the sewer network. The return places this overflow on the sewer network.
- How does Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO compare with other overflows?
- Blaydon Metals No 2 CSO recorded 36 spills in 2025. That is more than 79% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 2,801st nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 259th of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Tyne waterbody it ranks 34th of 177. Ranks compare counted spill events only. They do not compare volume or harm.
- Does zero spills mean the water was safe?
- No. A zero means the annual return recorded zero counted spill events for this outlet and year. It is not a water-quality test, and pollution can come from other sources.