Sewage Map

Belmont STW

Storm overflow operated by Northumbrian Water. The source names Unnamed Tributary of River Wear as the receiving water.

8
Spills in 2025
70.5
Recorded hours
62.5%
Monitor operation
2
Years listed
Current status unknown

We do not have a live report for this outlet. Its annual spill records are shown below.

Open official annual data ↗

How it compares in 2025

Belmont STW recorded 8 spills in 2025. That is more than 42% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 7,797th nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 853rd of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Wear from Croxdale Beck to Lumley Park Burn waterbody it ranks 17th of 46.

The monitor worked for 62.5% of 2025, so this count may be low and its rank may understate activity.

GroupRank by spillsMedian spillsMedian hours
This outlet–870.5
England7,797th of 14,2391122.3
Northumbrian Water853rd of 1,5591115.6
Wear from Croxdale Beck to Lumley Park Burn17th of 4655.3

Rank 1 has the most spills. Equal counts share a rank. Only overflows with a reported count are ranked. Counts do not measure volume, so a higher rank does not mean more sewage.

Annual spill history

n/a202482025
Amber bars mark years when the monitor worked for less than 90% of the year.
YearSpillsDurationMonitor operationSource
2025870.5 hours62.5%Low coverageOfficial data
2024UnknownUnknown0%Low coverageOfficial data

A missing figure means the source did not provide a usable value. A zero is shown as zero. Monitor operation below 90% can make comparison less reliable.

Outlet details

Water company
Northumbrian Water
Outlet type
Storm tank at a wastewater treatment works
Permit
245/1246
Activity reference
A2
Grid reference
NZ3037845330
Waterbody ID
GB103024077621Official waterbody record ↗
Location source
Official annual grid reference
Location precision
About 1 metres
Location note
Unknown

About the name and type

The annual return lists this asset as “Storm tank at WwTW”: storm tank at a wastewater treatment works. The overflow comes from storm storage at a treatment works.

The waterbody link opens the Environment Agency record for the exact ID in the return. It is a source lookup; we do not import its classification.

Where it is

The recorded position is about 2 km south-west of the West Rainton reference point in the ONS built-up areas data.

Area and water pages

Check the official record

Public access to this outlet is unknown. Do not enter restricted land or use this page as a route guide.

Open official source ↗

Other outlet records nearby

Questions about Belmont STW

Who operates Belmont STW?
Northumbrian Water is the operator named in the annual record. The permit reference is 245/1246.
Where does Belmont STW discharge?
The source names Unnamed Tributary of River Wear as the receiving water. This does not show how far a discharge travelled.
How many times did Belmont STW spill in 2025?
The 2025 return records 8 counted spill events and 70.5 hours of recorded discharge. Spills are counted with the 12/24-hour method, so this is not a count of every start signal.
Can I trust the 2025 figures for this outlet?
The monitor worked for 62.5% of the reporting period. Below 90%, some events can be missed, so the count and hours may understate activity.
Is Belmont STW discharging right now?
This record is not matched to a company live feed, so we cannot show a current report. Only the annual figures are available for this outlet.
How accurate is the map marker?
The marker comes from the grid reference in the official annual return, which is accurate to about 1 metres. It shows the recorded outlet position, not the extent of any discharge.
What kind of outlet is Belmont STW?
The annual return lists the asset type as “Storm tank at WwTW”, which means storm tank at a wastewater treatment works. The overflow comes from storm storage at a treatment works.
How does Belmont STW compare with other overflows?
Belmont STW recorded 8 spills in 2025. That is more than 42% of the 14,239 overflows in England with a reported figure, and ranks 7,797th nationally. Among Northumbrian Water overflows it ranks 853rd of 1,559; the median Northumbrian Water overflow recorded 11 spills. On the Wear from Croxdale Beck to Lumley Park Burn waterbody it ranks 17th of 46. Ranks compare counted spill events only. They do not compare volume or harm.
Does zero spills mean the water was safe?
No. A zero means the annual return recorded zero counted spill events for this outlet and year. It is not a water-quality test, and pollution can come from other sources.